Recent Posts Theft Act 1968 c. 60 - Statute Law Database: Theft Act 1968 c. 60 - Statute Law Database.
Show text without annotations
Return to Results withi...- Fraud Act: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service: The Fraud Act 2006 (the Act) comes into force on the 15 January 2007. It is based on the recommendat...
- Annual Audit Letter: My assessment of how you manage resources has been adversely affected
primarily by shortcomings in ...
- District auditor 18/12/09 Cowboys and Indians: AC.44 MID YEAR TREASURY MANAGEMENT REPORT > > The Committee considered a report from the Executive D...
- LOCAL CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – 2008/09: The framework for the Council’s Local Code of Corporate Governance reflects the guidance set out in ...
- Public Special Interest Report MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING : Members then debated the issues raised in the reports now submitted. The Leader of the Council point...
- 25% discount fraud: 25% discount fraud
You requested:
An indication of what information was provided by the 11 cou...
- Audit commision: I contacted your officers ( See enc ) on many occasions trying to understand these things. As you ca...
|
Theft Act 1968 c. 60 – Statute Law Database.
Show text without annotations
Return to Results within Legislation
Theft Act 1968 (c. 60)
Main body
Fraud and blackmail
Warning: This content may not be up-to-date. Please check the Update Status Warning message at the top of the Results within Legislation page.
Version 1 of 1
17.
False accounting.
— (1) Where
Continue reading Theft Act 1968 c. 60 – Statute Law Database
The Fraud Act 2006 (the Act) comes into force on the 15 January 2007. It is based on the recommendations of the Law Commission report “Fraud” (Note:Law Com No 276 Cm 5560 2002) published in 2002. The Act applies in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The Act repeals all the deception offences in the Theft Acts of 1968 and 1978 and replaces them with a single offence of fraud (Section 1) which can be committed in three different ways by:
* false representation (Section 2);
* failure to disclose information when there is a legal duty to do so (Section 3);
* abuse of position (Section
Continue reading Fraud Act: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service
My assessment of how you manage resources has been adversely affected
primarily by shortcomings in treasury management and the delivery of the capital
programme.
• Failings in treasury management highlighted by investments in Icelandic
banks led to a Public Interest Report that highlighted serious deficiencies in
your internal control arrangements. My use of resources work identified
concerns about the way your finances have been managed.
• There was a lack of realism in your approved capital programme which again
had to be subject of significant re-profiling early in the year and yet was
Continue reading Annual Audit Letter
Crazy Council posted this in District auditor on December 18th, 2009
AC.44 MID YEAR TREASURY MANAGEMENT REPORT > > The Committee considered a report from the Executive Director Business > Services outlining the performance of the Treasury Management function > of the Council for the six months ending 30 September 2009. This > report was submitted to the Cabinet meeting held on 23rd November, 2009. > > Councillor Jackson raised a concern that *there had been a breach of > the overdraft limit in the second quarter of the year.* Mr. Woollatt > explained that this was related to cashflow forecasts and procedures > had been tightened as a result. He added that, as the situation had > been identified at an early stage, the Council had not been penalised. > > *Councillor Jackson also queried whether targets for investment > returns had been set too high. Mr. Woollatt agreed that the targets > had been over optimistic and would be revised for next year’s budget.* > > RESOLVED — That the report be noted. mmm, then i look at the actions of the audit commission since
Continue reading District auditor 18/12/09 Cowboys and Indians
The framework for the Council’s Local Code of Corporate Governance reflects the guidance set out in the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA)/ Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (SOLACE) publication ‘Delivering Good Governance in Local Government – Framework’.
The original CIPFA/SOLACE framework, upon which the Council’s first Local Code of Corporate Governance was based (October 2004) placed an emphasis on the key good governance principles of Openness, Inclusivity, Integrity and
Continue reading LOCAL CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – 2008/09
Members then debated the issues raised in the reports now submitted. The Leader of the Council pointed out that the seriousness of the issues raised was accepted by all, and he expressed his regret that the Council found itself in this position. Accordingly, he moved the recommendations following the receipt of the PIR now before Council for
Continue reading Public Special Interest Report MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
25% discount fraud
You requested:
An indication of what information was provided by the 11 councils used to determine the Single Person Discount Review for Council Tax fraud figure in the report Protecting the Public
Continue reading 25% discount fraud
Crazy Council posted this in District auditor on September 17th, 2009
I contacted your officers ( See enc ) on many occasions trying to understand these things. As you can see, I first brought it to the attention of my council.
My question,
1 Whos fault is it that this kept accruing after I pointed it out.
1.1 Our council inner unelected ( monitoring officer, leader, 151 officer + minions )
1.2 District Auditor
1.3 The poor people of north east Lincolnshire
1.4 The councils ward councillors
1.5 someone else
Who’s fault that this was started .
1.1 The legal team and inner executive ( 2003-2004 )
1.2 The legal team and inner executive ( 2003-2004 )
1.3 The legal team and inner executive ( 2003-2004 )
1.4 The Audit commission
1.5 Someone else
1.6 The people of north east Lincolnshire.
What mechanisms stopped this being sorted out when I first pointed it out
1.1 Your legal constraint/ contractual obligations/ legislation
1.2 The interface between my councils figures and you ( Monitoring officer , 151 officer )
1.3 Incorrect figures presented to you.
1.4 Something else
Who was responsible in our council for loosing our money on various projects but lets start with the
iclandinc banks. ( could draw line from the bass leisure debarkel ( looses 200,000 to the Icelandic
debarkel 7million )
Is it.
1. Monitoring officer and head of legal, section 151 officer, elected leader ( As it suggests in our
council constitution. ) ( as am sure you understand we have a special executive arraignments
( special needs if you ask me )) ( check out there relationships to the scrutiny comity and audit
commity )
2. Your fault, or the auditor in line management
3. Our fault, the public,
4. Someone
Continue reading Audit commision
|
|